Reader contributionsContribute a measurement
Tested something we don't have on file — your own air fryer with a food we haven't measured, or a value far enough from ours to be worth a second data point? Fill in what you tested below. The same standard applies here as everywhere else on the site: nothing goes live without a source, and no amount of community agreement overrides food safety.
Where the site actually stands, so you know what you'd be walking into: 289 measurements are published, 289 of them copied out of a manufacturer's cooking chart. Not one was measured on a real appliance in a real kitchen — not by a reader, and not by us. 395 appliance-and-food combinations have no figure at all. A manual can be re-read by anyone; what you cooked last night cannot.
What you get backA nickname on the published row, permanently, if you want one — that's the only credit this site hands out, and it doesn't expire. Leave it blank and the measurement publishes anonymously instead.
What you'll hearIf you leave an email: one message when your measurement publishes, and one if we can't use it, saying why. No newsletter, no other use, no third party.
If you think we're wrongDisagreeing with a figure already on the site is a valid reason to submit. We don't quietly average your value into ours — see Contested, below.
How a reader measurement gets published
Every submission moves through the same four stages, whether it arrives through the form above or through the self-serve system later. Stages 1 and 2 run today. Stages 3 and 4 are the bar a measurement has to clear before it becomes a published number.
No reader measurement has been through this yet. The pipeline is written down, the safety checks are wired into the build, and the badge exists — but the count of reader contributions on the site is still zero. Whoever submits first isn't joining anything; they're the reason stage 3 ever runs. We'd rather say that plainly than pretend there's a crowd here.
Step 1Submitted
Your measurement reaches us. It isn't visible anywhere on the site.
Step 2Under Moderation
We check it for spam and abuse before it can appear publicly. Every submission goes through this, not only the ones that look risky.
Step 3Corroborating
An approved measurement publishes tagged "awaiting confirmation", so other owners of the same appliance can cook the same food and confirm the value.
Step 4Fully Confirmed
Three independent readers reporting a matching value — within ±2 minutes and ±10°C of each other — promotes it to the number we publish.
If readers disagreeContested
If measurements for the same appliance and food don't converge within that tolerance, we don't pick a winner. The real range readers reported publishes instead, taggedContested. An honest disagreement beats an arbitrary average — the same principle as rule 5 of how we test.
One rule that never bends: no amount of community confirmation pushes a published temperature below the USDA safe minimum for that food. On top of that, on any food with a safety threshold, a reader value 25% or more faster than the existing reference for that appliance and food stops the site build outright until a human has reviewed it. An undercooked time can't reach the site by accident.
For everything else — manufacturer data, our own testing, the sources behind each number — see how we test.